Friday, 5 October 2012

Muslim Rage and "Gazi" Ilm-Ud-Din


It is general perception that Muslim rage is a recent phenomenon is it really so ? . If we look into the history one of the earliest recorded incident of Muslim Rage in sub-continent  was as early as 1920 .Rage was due to a book called "Rangeela- Rasool" as a result  publisher of this book was killed by a fanatic Muslim by name Ilm-Ud-din. Intention of this blog is to present facts behind this Muslim Rage.

Written in 1920s Rangeela Rasool [Translation :  Colorful/Play boy Prophet Mohd (SAW) ] which is a salacious version of  Prophet Mohommed's life.   Book was written by  Krishan Prashaad Prataab with Pen name M. A. Chamupati .Book was published by lahore based publisher by name "Rajpal". Author agreed to publish the book on condition that his original name won't be disclosed .

This book is available in internet for download .I read the first few pages of this pocket size book of around 60 pages .Impression i got is that the book shows Prophet in poor light and book was written with malicious intention . Right from choosing the title of the book , preface , to describing SAW intention was always to show Prophet in poor light. 


 Cover page of Rangeela Rasool

There was a massive public outrage and the emotions were whipped up by Muslim leaders  . Pressure was built up by community leaders to ban this book and arrest Rajpal.  Rajpal was arrested by British govt tried in court but was promptly acquitted as there was no law which could convict a 'blasphemer'.

Fanatics made Several attempts  to murder Rajpal , finally Ilm din a 20 year old carpenter killed Rajpal by stabbing him .Irony is Ilm-ud-din was an illiterate and had never read this book. Ilm-din was provked by inciting speech given by some mullahs .


Ilm -ud-din


After this murder a high profile trial  followed defense lawyer for Ilm-Ud-Din was 'secular' Mohd Ali Jinnah.   Despite pressure from Muslims in general and Muslim 'intelligentsia' in particular court ordered to hang Ilm-ud-din .  And on On 31 October 1929, he was hanged till death. Below is the excerpt from the court order:

  That his assailant intended to cause death is established by the medical evidence which shows that he received no less than eight wounds, seven being incised and one a punctured one.  The nature of these injuries also show that Rajpal endeavoured to defend himself, for four of the incised wounds were on his hands.  He received a wound on the top of his head that cracked the right parietal bone, two incised wounds above the spine of the left scapula and a punctured wound in his chest.   This last pierced the heart cutting the fourth rib and caused almost instantaneous death.


On his funeral 'great' poet Alama iqbal who wrote "Sare Jahan se achha" was quoted saying:-

I am a sinful person not competent to do this job to lead the funeral of such a great warrior,...This uneducated young man has surpassed us, the educated ones .




After his death Ilm ud din was glorified by many articles, poetry  , books and films and justifying his heinous act  . Ilm-ud-din was given title Shaheed Ilm-ud-din Gazi (translation- Martyr, warrior Ilm-ud-din) .


Pakistani film glorifying 'Gazi'' Ilm ud din 

Every time there is a talk of scrapping Blasphemy law in Pakistan Muslim leaders quote Jinnah and Mohd iqbal to defend this law. 

This Muslim Rage isn't a recent phenomenon but a deep rooted dogma . Blaming politics , America , Hindus Jews won't help .


Blogger can be reached here :https://twitter.com/hindu_tweeter





Saturday, 29 September 2012

Did Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose die in plane crash?




Netaji 'supposedly' died in a plane crash at Taihoku (Taipei), Taiwan, on 18 August 1945 while en route to Tokyo . There are many claims and counter claims about his alleged death . Some believe he died in this plane crash and others are convinced he survived and the plane crash was a decoy to help Netaji escape. Three inquiry committees (Shah Nawaz, Khosla, Mukharjee ) were commissioned by Govt of India to probe into the death of Netaji during different occasions but still the controversy persists. Irony is conclusion of these committees are diagonally opposite to each other. For example Shah Nawaz committee came to conclusion that Netaji died in this air crash on other hand  Justice Mukherjee committee came to conclusion that air crash didn't happen. Intention of this post is to look objectively it to various news reports and articles from 1945 to 1950  time line .



Alleged Plane crash:



Source: The Telegraph-Herald Dated Aug 23, 1945  five days after the alleged plane crash .    

  • Plane crash was first reported by "Tokyo Radio".  
  • Plane was en-route to Tokyo from and crashed in Talhoku airfield in Taipei.
  • Netaji died next day after sustaining injury.
  • There were four  survivors in  this air crash and lone Indian survivor was  Netaji's aide and soldier in INA Col. Habibur rahman.

Eye witness account:


Source: Indian Express dated Jan 25 1946

  • S.A.Ayer was publicity and propaganda minister in Netaji's provincial govt. 
  • He narrated what allegedly happened based Col Habubur Rahman's account  .
  • S.A.Ayer was convinced with  Col.Habibur Rahman's account. At one point of time he was in tears  overwhelmed with sorrow.
  • Plane crash happened after it took off from Taihoku airport at around 2 PM on August 18 . 
  • Reason for crash propeller  - broken propeller just after taking off. 
  • Fire broke out due to crash and and due to burns injuries Netaji died on same day 9.PM 6-7 hrs later.


Reaction of various leaders:

Shah Nawaz commander in chief of "Subhas Brigade" regiment of INA wasn't sure of Netaji's death.

Source: The Indian Express - Jan 24, 1946
Mahatma Gandhi didn't believe Netaji died in crash :



The Lewiston Daily Sun - Jan 24, 1946

Nehru was eager to pronounce death of Netaji without convincing proof or proper investigation:


                                                                   Source: Indian Express -18thoctober 1946


Gen Mohan Singh  founding member of INA believed Netaji was alive and the supposed air crash was decoy to help Netaji escape from Russia . Mohan Singh had questioned Habibur Rahman many times but there was no satisfactory reply. Habibur Rahman claimed that even he was caught in fire , but there was no burnt marks on his body strange.



Source Indian Express - 23rd August 1949

Conclusion: 

Death of Netaji wasn't a open and shut case as many "intellectuals" believe . In-fact majority of people were either skeptic or did not believe Netaji died in this plane crash and death news.